Measuring accommodative facility

Published:

在附近评估住宿功能是理解患者的近视概况的重要组成部分。儿童和成人的近视进展可能受双目视觉功能的影响。与Emmetropes相比,据报道,近视儿童和年轻成年人的近期近期的食电镜和住宿滞后之间的关联。1-5Myopic children and young adults also show insufficient accommodative responses to lens-induced blur,1,6-8greater variability in accommodative response9,减少宽敞的容纳设施4, 8与年龄匹配的Emmetropes相比,增强了增强的容纳收敛(升高的AC /比率)。10-12There is speculation in the literature regarding accommodative lag prior to onset of myopia – evidence shows higher accommodative lag in progressing myopes, regardless of their starting point of refraction as an emmetrope or myope,4however other studies do not match this significance.13Myopia development and progression is multifactorial, though, so it’s important to assess all contributory factors – the myopia profile is designed to guide you through this clinical decision making and communication process.

A recent study from China has shown that children with a lower amplitude of accommodation showed a better myopia control response to orthokeratology over two years, indicating that improving accommodative function may be part of the mechanism.14Measuring accommodative amplitude through facility gives you a dynamic picture of how well your patient can cope with their accommodative lag – how much stamina they have to maintain near point focus.

用n6或更小的字母向您的患者提供近点卡 - 我使用封闭桨的顶部与下降的字母尺寸,或豪威尔豪洛里亚卡的背面。这应该持有33-40厘米的习惯性工作距离。(在您的较短武装患者的下端!)抓住±1.50和±2.00脚蹼,并将负面边合并为-3.50。如果您没有脚蹼(并且您应该订购一些!)使用每只眼睛持有的松动试镜。您可以在每只手中保存+2.00和-2.00,以便在它们之间快速切换以进行下面描述的设施测试。

您的儿科或年轻的成人近视患者与他们的全距离更正,应该能够清除这种功率,就像你期望他们的正相关住宿/ B-Test(响应减去)结果达到类似的水平。这是迅速测量部分容纳幅度响应。然后放下±1.50并将±2.00脚蹼切换到加侧。再次,近距离清除+2.00是预期的负相关住宿/ B +测试结果。15翻转几次+2.00和-2.00以观察结果,观察一个或两侧的疲劳,或者在整个方面保持迅速清算。

通常商定的用于测量容纳设施的临床方案包括观察响应时间,如果按时测量将包括临床医生和患者的反应时间。4Your result can be qualitative and quantitative. I prefer to record qualitative observations rather than a number of cycles per minute for enhanced clinical detail – for example:

  1. “Acc fac normal” – if both -3.50, +2.00 and -2.00 are cleared swiftly and consistently
  2. “Acc fac normal on plus, slow on -3.50, fatigues to fail on -2”
  3. “Acc fac normal on plus, failed -3.50, cleared -2 on cycles”

If patient 2 or 3 above has a lag of accommodation over +1.00, their results on accommodative facility testing indicate how much ‘petrol in the tank’ they have to account for the lag. Patient 2 is in bigger trouble than patient 3, because they showed an initial response to minus which fatigued to fail, whereas patient 3 consistently maintained lower levels of accommodative function (clearing -2.00). The old adage that there is many ways to skin a cat holds for many clinical techniques as well as record keeping – ultimately we need to know how our patient will functionally cope with accommodative demand through their day and you can adapt facility testing to evaluate this.

Click on thislink to read how to measure accommodative lag at near, 和这个link for advice on prescribing for accommodative dysfunctions.

要将更多信息化为我的BV诊断和管理的简化的双系统方法,您可以观看此视频题为Binocular Vision - easier than you think. This one hour lecture includes cases; details easy use of prism correction for vergence disorders; changes to BV in contact lens wear; and why BV matters - for reading and learning in kids, clinical problem solving, and myopia management. You can alsodownload my lecture notes here.

想要了解更多关于双筒望远镜的更多信息吗?

看看我的在线课程Binocular Vision Fundamentals,它从我的双系统方法开始于BV评估和诊断。通过了解住宿和易变系统,该课程介绍临床测试,诊断标准,处方和管理。一旦该基础设定,它就会进入临床通信和BV在近视管理中的重要性。始终采用激光剧焦于临床应用。

Included are video examples of assessment techniques and chairside infographic summary downloads to reference in practice.

你可以免费招收第一两个模块,如果您决定继续,全程价格为140美元。申请居住在较低的收入国家的从业者提供了30%和50%的课程费用 - 查看课程页面以获取更多信息。

凯特简介缩略图

关于凯特

Kate Gifford博士is a clinical optometrist, researcher, peer educator and professional leader from Brisbane, Australia, and a co-founder of Myopia Profile.

References

  1. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 1995;35:1299-1304.(link)
  2. Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:189-194.(link)
  3. Drobe B, de Saint-André R. The pre-myopic syndrome. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1995;15:375-378.(link)
  4. 艾伦下午,o'leary dj。住宿功能:共同依赖和与屈光误差的关系。视觉res。2006; 46:491-505。(link)
  5. 价格H,Allen Pm,Radhakrishnan H,Calver R,Rae S,Theagarayan B,Sailoganathan A,O'Leary DJ。剑桥抗近视研究:与近视进展相关的变量。optim is sci。2013; 90:1274-1283。(link)
  6. Bullimore Ma,Gilmartin B,Royston JM。稳态住宿和眼睛生物学在后期近视。Documenta Ophthalmologica。眼科进展。1992年; 80:143-155。(link)
  7. Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1998;18:13-20.(link)
  8. Pandian A, Sankaridurg PR, Naduvilath T, O'Leary D, Sweeney DF, Rose K, Mitchell P. Accommodative Facility in Eyes with and without Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4725-4731.(link)
  9. HARB E,Thorn F,TriloO D.在Emmetropes和Myopes中持续读取的适应性特征。视觉res。2006; 46:2581-2592。(link)
  10. Gwiazda J, Grice K, Thorn F. Response AC/A ratios are elevated in myopic children. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1999;19:173-179.(link)
  11. Gwiazda J,Thorn F,举行的R.住宿,容纳融合和响应AC /近期近视的比率。optim is sci。2005; 82:273-278。(link)
  12. Mutti DO, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. AC/A Ratio, Age, and Refractive Error in Children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2469-2478.(link)
  13. Rosenfield M,Desai R,Portello JK。进步默认会显示出缩小的容纳响应吗?optim is sci。2002; 79:268-273。(link)
  14. Zhu M, Feng H, Zhu J, Qu X. The impact of amplitude of accommodation on controlling the development of myopia in orthokeratology]. Chinese J Ophthalmol. 2014;50:14-19.(link)
  15. 埃文斯bjw。检测初级眼科医生实践中的双目视觉异常。麦克福尔的双筒望远镜异常(第五版)。爱丁堡:Butterworth-Heinemann;2007年:12-38。(link)

1 thought on “Measuring accommodative facility”

Leave a comment

Baidu